Phenom II X6 1035T vs Pentium J2900
Description
The 1035T is based on K10 architecture while the J2900 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the J2900 gets 34.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.3 times faster than the J2900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1035T gets a score of 80.2 k points while the J2900 gets 34.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.3 times faster than the J2900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
100fa0
30678
Core
Thuban
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.41 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
16.77k points
10.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
80.19k points
34.35k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
1035T
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
5.17k
5.1k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
5.33k
2.45k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.76k
1.92k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
1.17k (x0.33)
TOTAL
16.77k
10.65k (x0.63)
Multithread
1035T
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
29.82k
16.65k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
30.79k
9.21k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.88k
7.24k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
1.26k (x0.34)
TOTAL
80.19k
34.35k (x0.43)
Performance/W
1035T
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
1665 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
324 points/W
921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
724 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
126 points/W
TOTAL
844 points/W
3435 points/W
Performance/GHz
1035T
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
1668 points/GHz
1913 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
920 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/GHz
721 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1133 points/GHz
439 points/GHz
TOTAL
5409 points/GHz
3993 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4