FX 9590 vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
206d7
Core
Vishera
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/8
8 /16
TDP
220 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2013
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
8.76k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
7.35k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
3.86k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
3.32k (x0.46)
TOTAL
32.41k
23.28k (x0.72)
Multithread
9590
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
78.51k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
66.46k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
36.42k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.88k (x1.02)
TOTAL
137.65k
185.26k (x1.35)
Performance/W
9590
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4