FX 9590 vs Core i5-6400
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-6400 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i5-6400 gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 1 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i5-6400 gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-6400 is 1 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
506e3
Core
Vishera
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
220 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
48.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
174.05k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
11.82k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
18.36k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
4.43k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
4.95k (x0.69)
TOTAL
32.41k
39.56k (x1.22)
Multithread
9590
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
46.04k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
69.47k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
16.33k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
7.74k (x2.03)
TOTAL
137.65k
139.58k (x1.01)
Performance/W
9590
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
708 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
1069 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
251 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
2147 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
i5-6400
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3583 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
5563 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
1500 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
11987 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4