FX 9590 vs Core i5-10500T
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i5-10500T gets 233.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.7 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i5-10500T gets 233.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.7 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
a0653
Core
Vishera
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
220 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
302.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
14.01k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
21.17k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
5.21k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
11.42k (x1.6)
TOTAL
32.41k
51.82k (x1.6)
Multithread
9590
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
82.38k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
115.64k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
32.22k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.71k (x0.97)
TOTAL
137.65k
233.94k (x1.7)
Performance/W
9590
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
2354 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
3304 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
921 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
6684 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3687 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
5571 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
3005 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
13636 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4