FX 9590 vs Core i5-1035G4
Description
The 9590 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 143.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 143.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
706e5
Core
Vishera
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
220 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2013
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
142.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
13.9k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
20.13k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
9.41k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
10.59k (x1.48)
TOTAL
32.41k
54.03k (x1.67)
Multithread
9590
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
55.4k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
59.01k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
22.83k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
6.7k (x1.76)
TOTAL
137.65k
143.94k (x1.05)
Performance/W
9590
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
3694 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
3934 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
1522 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
9596 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
3757 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
5440 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
2862 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
14601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4