FX 9590 vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
Both models 9590 and 760K are based on Piledriver architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.8 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9590 gets a score of 137.6 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 9590 is 2.8 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
610f31
Core
Vishera
Richland
Base frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
220 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
July 2013
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
32.41k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
137.65k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9590
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.51k
9.53k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
9.57k
8.14k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.19k
3.45k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
3.48k (x0.49)
TOTAL
32.41k
24.6k (x0.76)
Multithread
9590
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
55.13k
18.2k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
51.69k
19.33k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.02k
8.42k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.86k (x1.01)
TOTAL
137.65k
49.8k (x0.36)
Performance/W
9590
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
251 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
235 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
17 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
626 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
9590
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
2302 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1914 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
837 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1429 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
6482 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4