FX 8350 vs Core i7-8550U
Description
The 8350 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 117.3 k points while the i7-8550U gets 105.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-8550U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 117.3 k points while the i7-8550U gets 105.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-8550U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
806ea
Core
Vishera
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2012
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.96k points
61.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.27k points
162.73k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.69k
13.15k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
19.7k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.54k
5.1k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
9.21k (x1.46)
TOTAL
27.96k
47.16k (x1.69)
Multithread
8350
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
44.6k
34.13k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
53.79k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.56k
13.91k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
4.12k (x0.78)
TOTAL
117.27k
105.95k (x0.9)
Performance/W
8350
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
357 points/W
2275 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
359 points/W
3586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
181 points/W
927 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
275 points/W
TOTAL
938 points/W
7063 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/GHz
3288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2054 points/GHz
4924 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1539 points/GHz
2303 points/GHz
TOTAL
6820 points/GHz
11791 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4