FX 8350 vs Core i7-4820K
Description
The 8350 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.1 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.1 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
306e4
Core
Vishera
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
125 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2012
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
28.16k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
118.14k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
11.85k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
8.41k
11.84k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.69k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
4.12k (x0.65)
TOTAL
28.16k
32.49k (x1.15)
Multithread
8350
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
44.93k
47.65k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
45.21k
54.81k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.81k
21.56k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
10.05k (x1.94)
TOTAL
118.14k
134.08k (x1.13)
Performance/W
8350
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
359 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
182 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
945 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
2402 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2050 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1541 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
6867 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4