FX 8350 vs Core i5-4570
Description
The 8350 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-4570 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 117.3 k points while the i5-4570 gets 124.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4570 is 1.1 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 117.3 k points while the i5-4570 gets 124.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4570 is 1.1 times faster than the 8350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
306c3
Core
Vishera
Haswell
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
125 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2012
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.96k points
43.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.27k points
161.61k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
9.69k
13.13k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
12.02k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.54k
5k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
4.65k (x0.74)
TOTAL
27.96k
34.8k (x1.24)
Multithread
8350
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
44.6k
49.75k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
45.72k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.56k
19.93k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
9.05k (x1.71)
TOTAL
117.27k
124.44k (x1.06)
Performance/W
8350
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
357 points/W
592 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
359 points/W
544 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
181 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
938 points/W
1481 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
i5-4570
Test#1 (Integers)
2364 points/GHz
3648 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2054 points/GHz
3340 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1539 points/GHz
1292 points/GHz
TOTAL
6820 points/GHz
9668 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4