FX 8350 vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 8350 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
a0652
Core
Vishera
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
28.16k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
118.14k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
15.65k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
8.41k
23.13k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
5.66k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
11.43k (x1.81)
TOTAL
28.16k
55.87k (x1.98)
Multithread
8350
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
44.93k
26.77k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
45.21k
43.81k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.81k
10.17k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
11.91k (x2.3)
TOTAL
118.14k
92.66k (x0.78)
Performance/W
8350
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
359 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
182 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
945 points/W
2059 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2402 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2050 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1541 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
6867 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4