FX 8350 vs Core i3-6100U
Description
The 8350 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i3-6100U gets 56.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the i3-6100U gets 56.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
406e3
Core
Vishera
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
28.16k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
118.14k points
69.94k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
8.06k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
8.41k
12.85k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.14k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
4.01k (x0.63)
TOTAL
28.16k
28.06k (x1)
Multithread
8350
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
44.93k
16.58k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
45.21k
28.88k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.81k
7.38k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
3.82k (x0.74)
TOTAL
118.14k
56.66k (x0.48)
Performance/W
8350
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
359 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
1925 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
182 points/W
492 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
254 points/W
TOTAL
945 points/W
3777 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2402 points/GHz
3506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2050 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1541 points/GHz
1742 points/GHz
TOTAL
6867 points/GHz
12201 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4