FX 8350 vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
Both models 8350 and 760K are based on Piledriver architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.4 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8350 gets a score of 118.1 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.4 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
610f31
Core
Vishera
Richland
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
125 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
October 2012
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
28.16k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
118.14k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8350
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
9.53k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
8.41k
8.14k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.45k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
3.48k (x0.55)
TOTAL
28.16k
24.6k (x0.87)
Multithread
8350
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
44.93k
18.2k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
45.21k
19.33k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.81k
8.42k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
3.86k (x0.74)
TOTAL
118.14k
49.8k (x0.42)
Performance/W
8350
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
359 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
362 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
182 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
42 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
945 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
8350
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
2402 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2050 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1541 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
6867 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4