| | | |

FX 8320 vs Core M-5Y10c


Description
The 8320 is based on Piledriver architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.

Summarizing, the 8320 is 2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f20
306d4
Core
Vishera
Broadwell-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
125 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2012
October 2014

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8320
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
5355
7223 (34.89%)
Test#2 (FP)
5142
9981 (94.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2147
2748 (27.99%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4040
2983 (-26.16%)
TOTAL
16684
22935 (37.47%)

Multithread

8320

M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
36789
15072 (-59.03%)
Test#2 (FP)
40203
24799 (-38.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19566
6676 (-65.88%)
Test#1 (Memory)
6657
4456 (-33.07%)
TOTAL
103215
51002 (-50.59%)

Performance/W
8320
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
294 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
322 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
157 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
826 points/W
10200 points/W

Performance/GHz
8320
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
1339 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1285 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
537 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1010 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
4171 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8