FX 8320 vs Athlon 5150 APU
Description
The 8320 is based on Piledriver architecture while the 5150 APU is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 3.4 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 3.4 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
700f01
Core
Vishera
Kabini
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
AM1
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
125 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
256 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2012
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
16.68k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
103.21k points
30.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8320
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
5.35k
3.02k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
5.14k
2.62k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.15k
1.59k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
1.02k (x0.25)
TOTAL
16.68k
8.26k (x0.5)
Multithread
8320
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
36.79k
12.06k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
10.42k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.57k
6.32k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
1.26k (x0.19)
TOTAL
103.21k
30.06k (x0.29)
Performance/W
8320
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
294 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
322 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
157 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
826 points/W
1203 points/W
Performance/GHz
8320
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
1339 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1285 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
537 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1010 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
4171 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4