FX 8320 vs Core i5-12500H
Description
The 8320 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the i5-12500H gets 201.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.9 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the i5-12500H gets 201.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.9 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
906a3
Core
Vishera
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/8
12/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
October 2012
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
16.68k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
103.21k points
225.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8320
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5.35k
21.11k (x3.94)
Test#2 (FP)
5.14k
19.61k (x3.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.15k
9.53k (x4.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
7.72k (x1.91)
TOTAL
16.68k
57.97k (x3.47)
Multithread
8320
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.79k
61.44k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
93.66k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.57k
40.09k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
6.01k (x0.9)
TOTAL
103.21k
201.2k (x1.95)
Performance/W
8320
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
294 points/W
1365 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
322 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
157 points/W
891 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
826 points/W
4471 points/W
Performance/GHz
8320
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1339 points/GHz
4692 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1285 points/GHz
4357 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
537 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1010 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
4171 points/GHz
12883 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4