FX 8320 vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The 8320 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the i3-1215U gets 129.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.3 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the i3-1215U gets 129.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.3 times faster than the 8320. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
906a4
Core
Vishera
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/8
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
October 2012
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
16.68k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
103.21k points
185.6k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8320
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.35k
15.63k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
5.14k
20.2k (x3.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.15k
9.94k (x4.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
8.06k (x1.99)
TOTAL
16.68k
53.83k (x3.23)
Multithread
8320
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.79k
35.72k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
56.41k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.57k
25k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
12.48k (x1.87)
TOTAL
103.21k
129.6k (x1.26)
Performance/W
8320
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
294 points/W
2381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
322 points/W
3761 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
157 points/W
1667 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
832 points/W
TOTAL
826 points/W
8640 points/W
Performance/GHz
8320
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
1339 points/GHz
3553 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1285 points/GHz
4591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
537 points/GHz
2260 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1010 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
4171 points/GHz
12234 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4