FX 8120 vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 8120 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8120 gets a score of 70.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the 8120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8120 gets a score of 70.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the 8120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
a0652
Core
Zambezi
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+8x16 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.5k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
70.78k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8120
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.31k
15.65k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
6.85k
23.13k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
5.66k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.58k
11.43k (x2.5)
TOTAL
23.5k
55.87k (x2.38)
Multithread
8120
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.84k
26.77k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
43.81k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.84k
10.17k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.61k
11.91k (x4.56)
TOTAL
70.78k
92.66k (x1.31)
Performance/W
8120
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
207 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
228 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
21 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
566 points/W
2059 points/W
Performance/GHz
8120
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2327 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1712 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
693 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
5876 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4