FX 8120 vs Core i3-9100
Description
The 8120 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8120 gets a score of 70.8 k points while the i3-9100 gets 164.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 2.3 times faster than the 8120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8120 gets a score of 70.8 k points while the i3-9100 gets 164.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 2.3 times faster than the 8120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
906eb
Core
Zambezi
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+8x16 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2011
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
23.5k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
70.78k points
229.2k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8120
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
9.31k
14.81k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
6.85k
22.15k (x3.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.77k
5.42k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.58k
4.8k (x1.05)
TOTAL
23.5k
47.17k (x2.01)
Multithread
8120
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.84k
52.08k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
87.45k (x3.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.84k
20.98k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.61k
4.24k (x1.62)
TOTAL
70.78k
164.75k (x2.33)
Performance/W
8120
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
207 points/W
801 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
228 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111 points/W
323 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
21 points/W
65 points/W
TOTAL
566 points/W
2535 points/W
Performance/GHz
8120
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
2327 points/GHz
3526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1712 points/GHz
5274 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
693 points/GHz
1289 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1143 points/GHz
TOTAL
5876 points/GHz
11232 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4