FX 6300 vs Core i5-3320M
Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i5-3320M gets 59.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i5-3320M gets 59.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3320M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
306a9
Core
Vishera
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
23.14k points
29.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.43k points
59.09k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
10.68k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
7.41k
10.53k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
4.09k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.2k
4.05k (x0.78)
TOTAL
23.14k
29.35k (x1.27)
Multithread
6300
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
25.2k
21.32k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
25.83k
23.86k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.47k
9.54k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
4.36k (x1.11)
TOTAL
66.43k
59.09k (x0.89)
Performance/W
6300
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
609 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
272 points/W
682 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
273 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
699 points/W
1688 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
2030 points/GHz
3237 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1951 points/GHz
3191 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
1239 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1229 points/GHz
TOTAL
6088 points/GHz
8895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4