FX 6300 vs Core i5-3320M
Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 57.1 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 57.1 k points while the i5-3320M gets 58.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
306a9
Core
Vishera
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
Jun 2012
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
7166
10714 (49.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
7860
10562 (34.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2674
4074 (52.35%)
Test#1 (Memory)
5098
3903 (-23.45%)
TOTAL
22798
29253 (28.31%)
Multithread
6300
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
20902
21225 (1.55%)
Test#2 (FP)
24644
23916 (-2.95%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8765
9413 (7.40%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2762
3871 (40.15%)
TOTAL
57072
58425 (2.37%)
Performance/W
6300
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
259 points/W
683 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92 points/W
269 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
601 points/W
1669 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2068 points/GHz
3201 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
704 points/GHz
1235 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1342 points/GHz
1183 points/GHz
TOTAL
6000 points/GHz
8865 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8