FX 6300 vs Core i5-3210M
Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i5-3210M gets 51.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i5-3210M gets 51.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
306a9
Core
Vishera
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
6/6
2 /2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
23.14k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.43k points
51.73k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
9.11k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
7.41k
8.88k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
3.46k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.2k
3.45k (x0.66)
TOTAL
23.14k
24.9k (x1.08)
Multithread
6300
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
25.2k
18.72k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
25.83k
21.09k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.47k
8.38k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
3.54k (x0.9)
TOTAL
66.43k
51.73k (x0.78)
Performance/W
6300
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
272 points/W
603 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
239 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
699 points/W
1478 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
2030 points/GHz
2939 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1951 points/GHz
2863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
1117 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1112 points/GHz
TOTAL
6088 points/GHz
8032 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4