FX 6300 vs Core i3-10110U
Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i3-10110U gets 84.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.3 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i3-10110U gets 84.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.3 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
806ec
Core
Vishera
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2012
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
23.14k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.43k points
106.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
14.25k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
7.41k
21.55k (x2.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.16k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.2k
4.26k (x0.82)
TOTAL
23.14k
45.22k (x1.95)
Multithread
6300
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.2k
26.15k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
25.83k
44.03k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.47k
10.71k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
3.28k (x0.83)
TOTAL
66.43k
84.17k (x1.27)
Performance/W
6300
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
1743 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
272 points/W
2935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
218 points/W
TOTAL
699 points/W
5611 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2030 points/GHz
3476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1951 points/GHz
5256 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
1258 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
TOTAL
6088 points/GHz
11029 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4