FX 6300 vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i3-10100T gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.6 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the i3-10100T gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 2.6 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
a0653
Core
Vishera
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.14k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.43k points
227.67k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
13.88k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
7.41k
20.94k (x2.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.18k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.2k
8.2k (x1.58)
TOTAL
23.14k
48.19k (x2.08)
Multithread
6300
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
25.2k
54.88k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
25.83k
93.17k (x3.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.47k
23.34k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
3.85k (x0.98)
TOTAL
66.43k
175.24k (x2.64)
Performance/W
6300
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
844 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
272 points/W
1433 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
699 points/W
2696 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2030 points/GHz
3228 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1951 points/GHz
4869 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
1204 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1907 points/GHz
TOTAL
6088 points/GHz
11208 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4