FX 6300 vs 8350
Description
Both models 6300 and 8350 are based on Piledriver architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 57.1 k points while the 8350 gets 117.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.1 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 57.1 k points while the 8350 gets 117.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.1 times faster than the 6300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
600f20
Core
Vishera
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/8
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2012
October 2012
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
7166
9847 (37.42%)
Test#2 (FP)
7860
8418 (7.09%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2674
3576 (33.71%)
Test#1 (Memory)
5098
6267 (22.93%)
TOTAL
22798
28107 (23.29%)
Multithread
6300
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
20902
44810 (114.38%)
Test#2 (FP)
24644
45461 (84.47%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8765
22736 (159.41%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2762
4898 (77.32%)
TOTAL
57072
117904 (106.59%)
Performance/W
6300
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
259 points/W
364 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
92 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
29 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
601 points/W
943 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1886 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2068 points/GHz
2053 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
704 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1342 points/GHz
1528 points/GHz
TOTAL
6000 points/GHz
6855 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8