FX 6300 vs 6100
Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the 6100 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
600f12
Core
Vishera
Zambezi
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/6
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
3x64+6x16 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2012
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
23.14k points
20.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.43k points
65.32k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
7.15k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
7.41k
6.53k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.55k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.2k
4.2k (x0.81)
TOTAL
23.14k
20.42k (x0.88)
Multithread
6300
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.2k
24.5k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.83k
23.85k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.47k
13.45k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
3.51k (x0.9)
TOTAL
66.43k
65.32k (x0.98)
Performance/W
6300
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
272 points/W
251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
142 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
699 points/W
688 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2030 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1951 points/GHz
1673 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
1077 points/GHz
TOTAL
6088 points/GHz
5235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4