FX 6300 vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
Both models 6300 and 760K are based on Piledriver architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.3 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 1.3 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
610f31
Core
Vishera
Richland
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
October 2012
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
23.14k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.43k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
9.53k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
7.41k
8.14k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
3.45k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.2k
3.48k (x0.67)
TOTAL
23.14k
24.6k (x1.06)
Multithread
6300
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.2k
18.2k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
25.83k
19.33k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.47k
8.42k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
3.86k (x0.98)
TOTAL
66.43k
49.8k (x0.75)
Performance/W
6300
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
272 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
699 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
2030 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1951 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
6088 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4