FX 6300 vs A6 9210
Description
The 6300 is based on Piledriver architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 2.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 2.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
670f00
Core
Vishera
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2012
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
23.14k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.43k points
27.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
4.71k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
7.41k
11.03k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.59k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.2k
2.45k (x0.47)
TOTAL
23.14k
20.78k (x0.9)
Multithread
6300
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
25.2k
8.43k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
25.83k
12.8k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.47k
3.32k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
2.59k (x0.66)
TOTAL
66.43k
27.13k (x0.41)
Performance/W
6300
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
272 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
699 points/W
1809 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2030 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1951 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
6088 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4