FX 6300 vs A4 6300B
Description
Both models 6300 and 6300B are based on Piledriver architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 2.4 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300 gets a score of 66.4 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 2.4 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
610f31
Core
Vishera
Richland
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
October 2012
December 2013
Mean monothread perf.
23.14k points
20.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.43k points
27.54k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
8.35k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
7.41k
7.31k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.95k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.2k
1.51k (x0.29)
TOTAL
23.14k
20.11k (x0.87)
Multithread
6300
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
25.2k
10.88k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
25.83k
10.01k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.47k
5.02k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
1.63k (x0.41)
TOTAL
66.43k
27.54k (x0.41)
Performance/W
6300
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
265 points/W
167 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
272 points/W
154 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
121 points/W
77 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
41 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
699 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
2030 points/GHz
2140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1951 points/GHz
1873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
756 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1367 points/GHz
387 points/GHz
TOTAL
6088 points/GHz
5157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4