FX 6100 vs Core m7-6Y75
Description
The 6100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.2 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.2 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
406e3
Core
Zambezi
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2011
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
10.24k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
15.33k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.97k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
5.32k (x1.27)
TOTAL
20.42k
33.86k (x1.66)
Multithread
6100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
16.78k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
25.09k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
6.14k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
5.58k (x1.59)
TOTAL
65.32k
53.58k (x0.82)
Performance/W
6100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
6100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4