| | | | | | |

FX 6100 vs Core i7-8550U


Description
The 6100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i7-8550U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i7-8550U gets 105.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8550U is 1.6 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
600f12
806ea
Core
Zambezi
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2011
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
64.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
166.12k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
13.15k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
19.7k (x3.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
5.1k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
9.21k (x2.19)
TOTAL
20.42k
47.16k (x2.31)

Multithread

6100

i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
34.13k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
53.79k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
13.91k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.12k (x1.17)
TOTAL
65.32k
105.95k (x1.62)

Performance/W
6100
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
2275 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
3586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
927 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
275 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
7063 points/W

Performance/GHz
6100
i7-8550U
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
3288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
4924 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
2303 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
11791 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4