FX 6100 vs Core i5-10500T
Description
The 6100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i5-10500T gets 233.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 3.6 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i5-10500T gets 233.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 3.6 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
a0653
Core
Zambezi
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
302.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
14.01k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
21.17k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
5.21k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
11.42k (x2.72)
TOTAL
20.42k
51.82k (x2.54)
Multithread
6100
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
82.38k (x3.36)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
115.64k (x4.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
32.22k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.71k (x1.06)
TOTAL
65.32k
233.94k (x3.58)
Performance/W
6100
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
2354 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
3304 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
921 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
6684 points/W
Performance/GHz
6100
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
3687 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
5571 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
3005 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
13636 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4