FX 6100 vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 6100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.4 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.4 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
a0652
Core
Zambezi
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2011
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
15.65k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
23.13k (x3.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
5.66k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
11.43k (x2.72)
TOTAL
20.42k
55.87k (x2.74)
Multithread
6100
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
26.77k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
43.81k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
10.17k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
11.91k (x3.39)
TOTAL
65.32k
92.66k (x1.42)
Performance/W
6100
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
2059 points/W
Performance/GHz
6100
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4