FX 6100 vs Core i3-6100
Description
The 6100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i3-6100 gets 94.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.4 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i3-6100 gets 94.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.4 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
506e3
Core
Zambezi
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/2
TDP
95 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2011
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
112.28k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
13.78k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
21.21k (x3.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
5.2k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
3.73k (x0.89)
TOTAL
20.42k
43.92k (x2.15)
Multithread
6100
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
29.02k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
49.55k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
12.3k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.28k (x0.93)
TOTAL
65.32k
94.15k (x1.44)
Performance/W
6100
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
569 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
972 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
241 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
1846 points/W
Performance/GHz
6100
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
3723 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
1009 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
11871 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4