FX 6100 vs Core i3-4160
Description
The 6100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i3-4160 gets 74 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 1.1 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i3-4160 gets 74 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 1.1 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
306c3
Core
Zambezi
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2011
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
74k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
13.02k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
12k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
4.91k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
4.23k (x1.01)
TOTAL
20.42k
34.16k (x1.67)
Multithread
6100
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
27.45k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
28.96k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
11.83k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
5.77k (x1.64)
TOTAL
65.32k
74k (x1.13)
Performance/W
6100
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
508 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
536 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
219 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
1370 points/W
Performance/GHz
6100
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
3616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
3334 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
1363 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
9488 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4