FX 6100 vs Core i3-10105
Description
The 6100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i3-10105 gets 195.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 3 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the i3-10105 gets 195.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 3 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
a0653
Core
Zambezi
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2011
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
253.93k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
16.11k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
24.12k (x3.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
5.71k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
7.89k (x1.88)
TOTAL
20.42k
53.83k (x2.64)
Multithread
6100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
58.25k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
105.73k (x4.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
27.8k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.51k (x1)
TOTAL
65.32k
195.29k (x2.99)
Performance/W
6100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
1627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
428 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
3004 points/W
Performance/GHz
6100
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
3662 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
5481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
12235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4