FX 6100 vs Ryzen 5 3500U
Description
The 6100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the 3500U gets 146.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.2 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the 3500U gets 146.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.2 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
810f81
Core
Zambezi
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2011
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
140.97k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
11.1k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
18.97k (x2.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
3.9k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
3.39k (x0.81)
TOTAL
20.42k
37.37k (x1.83)
Multithread
6100
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
45.74k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
75.47k (x3.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
21.89k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.49k (x0.99)
TOTAL
65.32k
146.6k (x2.24)
Performance/W
6100
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
3049 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
5032 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
1459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
233 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
9773 points/W
Performance/GHz
6100
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
3001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
5128 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
1053 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
916 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
10099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4