FX 6100 vs 4100
Description
Both models 6100 and 4100 are based on Bulldozer architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.5 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.5 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
600f12
Core
Zambezi
Zambezi
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2011
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
22.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
44.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
7.65k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
6.9k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.88k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
4.75k (x1.13)
TOTAL
20.42k
22.18k (x1.09)
Multithread
6100
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
15.53k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
15.13k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
7.98k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
5.67k (x1.61)
TOTAL
65.32k
44.31k (x0.68)
Performance/W
6100
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
163 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
159 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
60 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
466 points/W
Performance/GHz
6100
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
1815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
758 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
5836 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4