FX 6100 vs A10 7700K
Description
The 6100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the 7700K is based on Steamroller.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the 7700K gets 57.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.1 times faster than the 7700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6100 gets a score of 65.3 k points while the 7700K gets 57.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.1 times faster than the 7700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
630f01
Core
Zambezi
Kaveri
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket FM2+
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+6x16 kB
kB
Cache L2
3x2048 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2011
January 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.42k points
21.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
65.32k points
57.89k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6100
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.15k
7.33k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
6.53k
7.99k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
2.91k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
3.15k (x0.75)
TOTAL
20.42k
21.38k (x1.05)
Multithread
6100
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
24.5k
23.06k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
23.85k
20.11k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.45k
10.44k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.28k (x1.22)
TOTAL
65.32k
57.89k (x0.89)
Performance/W
6100
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
251 points/W
212 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
142 points/W
110 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
688 points/W
609 points/W
Performance/GHz
6100
7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1832 points/GHz
1929 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1673 points/GHz
2101 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
653 points/GHz
765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1077 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
TOTAL
5235 points/GHz
5625 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4