FX 4100 vs Core i7-6600U
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i7-6600U gets 45.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6600U is 1 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i7-6600U gets 45.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6600U is 1 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
406e3
Core
Zambezi
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2011
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
79.22k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
8.49k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
10.92k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
2.76k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
4.93k (x1.04)
TOTAL
22.18k
27.1k (x1.22)
Multithread
4100
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
14.11k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
20.05k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
6.17k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
4.73k (x0.83)
TOTAL
44.31k
45.05k (x1.02)
Performance/W
4100
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
940 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
1337 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
411 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
315 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
3004 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
2497 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
3211 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
813 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
7970 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4