FX 4100 vs Core i5-4210U
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-4210U gets 32.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4100 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-4210U gets 32.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4100 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
40651
Core
Zambezi
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2011
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
57.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
5.05k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
5.31k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
2.1k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
1.41k (x0.3)
TOTAL
22.18k
13.87k (x0.63)
Multithread
4100
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
9.01k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
16.3k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
4.64k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
2.16k (x0.38)
TOTAL
44.31k
32.1k (x0.72)
Performance/W
4100
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
600 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
1087 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
309 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
2140 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
1871 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
1965 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
778 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
522 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4