FX 4100 vs Core i5-3340M
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3340M is 1.4 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3340M is 1.4 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
306a9
Core
Zambezi
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2011
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
62.75k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
11.51k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
11.13k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
4.4k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
4.55k (x0.96)
TOTAL
22.18k
31.58k (x1.42)
Multithread
4100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
22.59k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
25.49k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
10.42k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
4.25k (x0.75)
TOTAL
44.31k
62.75k (x1.42)
Performance/W
4100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
1793 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4