FX 4100 vs Core i3-7130U
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i3-7130U gets 68.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.5 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i3-7130U gets 68.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.5 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
806e9
Core
Zambezi
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2011
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
42k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
90.89k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
9.99k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
15.18k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
3.67k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
4.09k (x0.86)
TOTAL
22.18k
32.94k (x1.49)
Multithread
4100
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
20.69k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
34.96k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
8.75k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
3.73k (x0.66)
TOTAL
44.31k
68.13k (x1.54)
Performance/W
4100
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
1379 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
2331 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
4542 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
3701 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
5623 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
1359 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
12200 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4