FX 4100 vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the 760K is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 760K is 1.1 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 760K is 1.1 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
610f31
Core
Zambezi
Richland
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
October 2011
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
9.53k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
8.14k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
3.45k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
3.48k (x0.73)
TOTAL
22.18k
24.6k (x1.11)
Multithread
4100
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
18.2k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
19.33k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
8.42k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
3.86k (x0.68)
TOTAL
44.31k
49.8k (x1.12)
Performance/W
4100
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4