FX 4100 vs Core i5-1235U
Description
The 4100 is based on Bulldozer architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-1235U gets 301.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 6.8 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4100 gets a score of 44.3 k points while the i5-1235U gets 301.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 6.8 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f12
906a4
Core
Zambezi
Alder Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/4
10/12
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+4x16 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x2048 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2011
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
22.18k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
44.31k points
297.46k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
4100
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.65k
23.03k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
24.11k (x3.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
13.9k (x4.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
12.11k (x2.55)
TOTAL
22.18k
73.15k (x3.3)
Multithread
4100
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.53k
111.78k (x7.2)
Test#2 (FP)
15.13k
124.18k (x8.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.98k
59.87k (x7.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.67k
5.76k (x1.02)
TOTAL
44.31k
301.58k (x6.81)
Performance/W
4100
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
163 points/W
7452 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
159 points/W
8279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84 points/W
3991 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
60 points/W
384 points/W
TOTAL
466 points/W
20106 points/W
Performance/GHz
4100
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
2013 points/GHz
5235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1815 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/GHz
3158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
2753 points/GHz
TOTAL
5836 points/GHz
16626 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4