E2 Series 3800 vs Core i5-2467M
Description
The 3800 is based on Jaguar architecture while the i5-2467M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800 gets a score of 22.5 k points while the i5-2467M gets 29.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2467M is 1.3 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800 gets a score of 22.5 k points while the i5-2467M gets 29.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2467M is 1.3 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
206a7
Core
Kabini
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
FT3
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2014
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
6.52k points
14.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.52k points
29.78k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.24k
5.4k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
2.13k
4.9k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.23k
2.4k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.92k
2.09k (x2.27)
TOTAL
6.52k
14.78k (x2.27)
Multithread
3800
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.61k
11.67k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
8.13k
10.74k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.09k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.17k
2.28k (x1.95)
TOTAL
22.52k
29.78k (x1.32)
Performance/W
3800
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
574 points/W
686 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
542 points/W
632 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
1501 points/W
1752 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800
i5-2467M
Test#1 (Integers)
1725 points/GHz
2347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
943 points/GHz
1042 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
708 points/GHz
907 points/GHz
TOTAL
5016 points/GHz
6424 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4