E2 Series 3800 vs E1 2500
Description
Both models 3800 and 2500 are based on Jaguar architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800 gets a score of 22.5 k points while the 2500 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800 is 2.5 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800 gets a score of 22.5 k points while the 2500 gets 9.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800 is 2.5 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
700f01
Core
Kabini
Kabini
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
1.4 GHz
Socket
FT3
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2014
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
6.52k points
6.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.52k points
9.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.24k
2.35k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
2.13k
2.21k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.23k
1.24k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.92k
0.84k (x0.91)
TOTAL
6.52k
6.64k (x1.02)
Multithread
3800
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
8.61k
3.3k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
8.13k
3.21k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
1.76k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.17k
0.87k (x0.74)
TOTAL
22.52k
9.13k (x0.41)
Performance/W
3800
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
574 points/W
220 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
542 points/W
214 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
117 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1501 points/W
609 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
1725 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/GHz
1581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
943 points/GHz
885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
708 points/GHz
600 points/GHz
TOTAL
5016 points/GHz
4745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4