E2 Series 3800 vs A6 9210
Description
The 3800 is based on Jaguar architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800 gets a score of 22.5 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.2 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800 gets a score of 22.5 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.2 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
670f00
Core
Kabini
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
FT3
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Date
January 2014
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
6.52k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.52k points
27.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2.24k
4.71k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
2.13k
11.03k (x5.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.23k
2.59k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.92k
2.45k (x2.66)
TOTAL
6.52k
20.78k (x3.19)
Multithread
3800
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
8.61k
8.43k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
8.13k
12.8k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
3.32k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.17k
2.59k (x2.2)
TOTAL
22.52k
27.13k (x1.2)
Performance/W
3800
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
574 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
542 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
1501 points/W
1809 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1725 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
943 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
708 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
5016 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4