E2 Series 3800 vs A6 7310
Description
The 3800 is based on Jaguar architecture while the 7310 is based on Puma.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800 gets a score of 22.5 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.6 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800 gets a score of 22.5 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.6 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
730f01
Core
Kabini
Carrizo-L
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
FT3
FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2014
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
6.52k points
11.17k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.52k points
35.87k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3800
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
2.24k
4.08k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
2.13k
3.76k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.23k
2.21k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.92k
1.12k (x1.22)
TOTAL
6.52k
11.17k (x1.71)
Multithread
3800
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
8.61k
13.38k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
8.13k
13.51k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
7.39k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.17k
1.59k (x1.36)
TOTAL
22.52k
35.87k (x1.59)
Performance/W
3800
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
574 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
542 points/W
540 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
307 points/W
296 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1501 points/W
1435 points/W
Performance/GHz
3800
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
1725 points/GHz
1700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/GHz
1566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
943 points/GHz
921 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
708 points/GHz
467 points/GHz
TOTAL
5016 points/GHz
4654 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4