E1 2500 vs Xeon E5-4640
Description
The 2500 is based on Jaguar architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the E5-4640 gets 610.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 67.1 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the E5-4640 gets 610.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 67.1 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
206d7
Core
Kabini
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
8 /16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2013
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
6.64k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.13k points
610.16k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2500
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
2.35k
5.01k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
2.21k
4.5k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
2.18k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
2.19k (x2.61)
TOTAL
6.64k
13.88k (x2.09)
Multithread
2500
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
251.29k (x76.22)
Test#2 (FP)
3.21k
236.61k (x73.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
114.89k (x65.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
7.36k (x8.46)
TOTAL
9.13k
610.16k (x66.83)
Performance/W
2500
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
2645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
214 points/W
2491 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
117 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
609 points/W
6423 points/W
Performance/GHz
2500
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
1679 points/GHz
1790 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1581 points/GHz
1609 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
885 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
600 points/GHz
782 points/GHz
TOTAL
4745 points/GHz
4957 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4