E1 2500 vs E2 Series 3800
Description
Both models 2500 and 3800 are based on Jaguar architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800 is 2.5 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 9.1 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800 is 2.5 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
700f01
Core
Kabini
Kabini
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
FT3
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
May 2013
January 2014
Mean monothread perf.
6.64k points
6.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.13k points
22.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2500
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
2.35k
2.24k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
2.21k
2.13k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.24k
1.23k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
0.92k (x1.1)
TOTAL
6.64k
6.52k (x0.98)
Multithread
2500
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
8.61k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
3.21k
8.13k (x2.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
4.61k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.87k
1.17k (x1.35)
TOTAL
9.13k
22.52k (x2.47)
Performance/W
2500
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
220 points/W
574 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
214 points/W
542 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
117 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
609 points/W
1501 points/W
Performance/GHz
2500
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
1679 points/GHz
1725 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1581 points/GHz
1640 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
885 points/GHz
943 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
600 points/GHz
708 points/GHz
TOTAL
4745 points/GHz
5016 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4