E1 2500 vs Athlon 5150 APU
Description
Both models 2500 and 5150 APU are based on Jaguar architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 8.4 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5150 APU is 3.6 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2500 gets a score of 8.4 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5150 APU is 3.6 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
700f01
Core
Kabini
Kabini
Base frecuency
1.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
AM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
256 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
May 2013
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
6.57k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.44k points
30.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2500
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
2.33k
3.02k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
2.19k
2.62k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.22k
1.59k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.83k
1.02k (x1.22)
TOTAL
6.57k
8.26k (x1.26)
Multithread
2500
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
3.06k
12.06k (x3.95)
Test#2 (FP)
2.95k
10.42k (x3.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.59k
6.32k (x3.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
1.26k (x1.49)
TOTAL
8.44k
30.06k (x3.56)
Performance/W
2500
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
204 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
197 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
56 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
563 points/W
1203 points/W
Performance/GHz
2500
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
1661 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1562 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
871 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
596 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
4690 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4